MAGAZINE

The modern couple: loving without losing yourself

A conversation by the pool at a holiday club in Djerba, between a Frenchwoman and Ania, a young Polish woman. Two generations, two countries — and the same realization: couples have never been so free, or so demanding. A report on the modern art of loving without losing yourself.

✍ An idea from Audrey, in Djerba.

It begins like all good ideas do: by chance. Under a parasol, between two dips in the pool, a conversation gets going with Ania, a young woman from Poland. We talk about everything, then about what matters most: love, being a couple, what we expect from it. And very quickly, one truth crosses miles and generations — from Warsaw to Paris, the questions are the same: how do we remain two without becoming one? How can we be free without being alone?

It wasn’t so long ago that the question never even came up. The couple was an institution before it was a story: people married to build a family, to pass things on, sometimes to survive — and each received their role with the wedding ring. They stayed together because they had to, because everything — family, village, law — kept the door shut. Love certainly existed, but it wasn’t the contract; if you were lucky, it was the bonus.

Then everything changed in barely two generations. Sociologists have a name for what happened to us: the “pure relationship,” described by the British sociologist Anthony Giddens — a couple held together no longer by obligation, but by choice, and lasting only as long as each person gets something out of it. It is an immense freedom, and a dizzying one: when nothing forces us to stay, everything rests on the quality of the bond. The modern couple no longer lives under a roof; it is a house rebuilt every day.

Its first building block is independence. Two jobs, two circles of friends, two secret gardens, sometimes two bank accounts — and that isn’t selfishness: it is what allows each person to enter the relationship whole. Ania put it beautifully: she isn’t looking for a better half; she’s looking for a partner. And the foundation of that partnership rests on one word that every language in Europe is conjugating right now: respect — for the other person, their time, their silences, their ambitions.

But let’s be honest: when independence is made a religion, it mostly creates well-organized loneliness. A couple of two perfectly self-sufficient people who never bend has another name — a shared flat. Compromise isn’t defeat; it is the very craft of loving: yielding on the movie, the destination, the color of the sofa, and sometimes much more, without keeping score. The couples who last aren’t the ones who give up nothing; they’re the ones who know what they’re giving things up for.

And then there is reality, which doesn’t care about theories: work, home, family, children. Modern love is proved less in declarations than in logistics — who gets up tonight, who cuts their workday short, who keeps track of everyone’s calendar. Taking responsibility is the least photogenic and most serious declaration of love there is. In a couple today, everything can be renegotiated except this: being there when it’s your turn, and sometimes even when it isn’t.

So, the modern couple? More fragile than before, since nothing compels it anymore — and stronger than before, since every day together is a chosen day. Free, respectful, responsible, able to compromise: it’s a demanding program, and perhaps that’s what makes it beautiful. Thanks to Audrey for the idea, and to Ania: proof that the best conversations happen on holiday. On our webcams right now, couples are walking through the squares of Warsaw, Paris, and Djerba — look at them: each at their own pace, all heading in the same direction. Good vibes on this round Earth.

← Magazine